Track (Run Assessment)

Players: Peer Assessment Author, Students, Group, Peer Assessor, Assessment Analyst Descriptions: 1. Records student completing peer marking 2. Shares data with learner support services 3. Capture data for Audit

Evidence:

Hull, 1. Original driver was to save time in marking, first iteration of the model works, but not very well, still taking a long time to use - Students not submitting peer marks needs chasing 2. Allocate forms to courses and groups within courses

Loughborough, One of key reasons for using online would be good monitor/ notification/ evidence system i.e. have they peer marked, if not notify, if not renotify if not tell them closing and keep records, selectively email those not completing - currently blanket emails all even those that have completed Currently 4 states Pending - either being created or scheduled to run in the future Open - currently being peer assessed Closed - closed for further peer assessment Marked - marked and moderated

SPARK ( UTS University of Technology Sydney), 1. Academic monitors groups during completion of group project/task outcomes 2. Academic identifies weighting for group assessment task and key assessment criteria for marking the group submission 3. Student reflects on SPA and SAPA factor to decide how future behaviour may change to improve collaboration, interpersonal and reflection capabilities 4. Academic evaluates effectiveness (eg. online surveys, focus groups, ones own reflection)

Related items
This usecase is decomposed from the following usecases:
 * is decomposed from::Peer Assessment

This usecase is part of the following usecases:
 * is part of::Mark Assessment (Peer Assessment)
 * is part of::Moderate Assessment (Peer Assessment)
 * is part of::Reflect (Peer Assessment)
 * is part of::Run Assessment