Moderate Assessment (Peer Assessment)

Players: Peer Assessment Author, Students, Group, Peer Assessor, Assessment Analyst Description: 1. Tutor investigates balance between Tutor and Group view 2. Tutor decides on moderated weights 3. Tutor produces final marks 4. Students are notified of marks 5. Marks are stored

Evidence:

Hull, 1. Model use tutors mark as a weighting for the group marks. 2.	Marks published via Blackboard - integration. 3.	Marks archival service

Loughborough, 1. Balance of Peer assessment and Tutor marked can be automatically changed in defined increments to investigate effect and produce appropriate moderated mark i.e. 50% Tutor/ 50% Peer or 60% Tutor / 40% Peer etc 2. Currently individual has 1 mark to distribute - originally all group but this created bias for non submission - also penalty for non submisison 3. Envisage integration to Gradebook to record final marks

SPARK ( UTS University of Technology Sydney), 1. Academic communicates group project mark to each group 2. Academics consults SPARK for adjustment factors and apply to group mark 3. Academic provides each individual student with summative feedback (i.e. the adjusted individual mark) *** 4. Academic may provide each individual student with formative feedback ****

Related items
This usecase is decomposed from the following usecases:
 * is decomposed from::Peer Assessment

This usecase includes the following usecases:
 * includes::Notify (Author Assessment)
 * includes::Track (Run Assessment)