Schedule (Author Assessment)

Players: Peer Assessment Author, Students, Group, Peer Assessor, Assessment Analyst Descriptions: 1. Tutor defines events / states 2. Tutor allocates dates / timescales to events / states 3. Tutors defines tracking required

Evidence:

Hull, Original driver was to save time in marking, first iteration of the model works, but not very well, still taking a long time to use - Students not submitting peer marks needs chasing

Loughborough, One of key reasons for using online would be good monitor/ notification/ evidence system i.e. have they peer marked, if not notify, if not re-notify if not tell them closing and keep records, selectively email those not completing - currently blanket emails all even those that have completed Currently 4 states Pending - either being created or scheduled to run in the future Open - currently being peer assessed Closed - closed for further peer assessment Marked - marked and moderated

SPARK ( UTS University of Technology Sydney) 1. Academic monitors groups during completion of group project/task outcomes

Related items
This usecase is decomposed from the following usecases:
 * is decomposed from::Peer Assessment

This usecase is part of the following usecases:
 * is part of::Author Assessment (Peer Assessment)
 * is part of::Run Assessment