Reflect (Peer Assessment)

Players: Peer Assessment Author, Students, Group, Peer Assessor, Assessment Analyst Descriptions: 1. Tutor reflects on if group learning and assessment appropriate 2. Tutor reflects on previous performance 3. Tutor designs support to best ensure successful learning and assessment 4. Tutor collects student feedback 5. Tutor analyses student feedback 6. Tutor researches behaviours and possible improvements 7. Tutor evaluates effectiveness 8. Tutor reflects on this year's performance

Evidence:

Hull, Building a model for 10 years. Use this to check a groups performance. 1. Reflect before starting, during and after completing each year

Loughborough, Been developed for over 5 years has been online for 5 driven by Peter Wilmot's needs/ideas. 1. One of key reasons for using online would be good monitor/ notification/ evidence system i.e. have they peer marked, if not notify, if not renotify if not tell them closing and keep records, selectively email those not completing - currently blanket emails all even those that have completed 2. WebPA records involvement feeds evidence to Cotutor ( Mentor and Support system) &#92; Helps Learning -> Assessment -> Support -> Learning cycle 3. Development controlled by defined process ( Proposal->Advisory Board->Validation-> development project ) 4. Research options and research evidence very much part of current development so can investigate, report and improve based on evidence e.g. currently final year students monitoring each group and then contributing a peer/ mentor assessment. Papers by Peter Wilmott et al at ICEE 2004 and 2005

SPARK ( UTS University of Technology Sydney), 1. Academics determine if group learning and assessment tasks necessary to achieve learning outcomes 2. Academic identifies weighting for group assessment task and key assessment criteria for marking the group submission 3. Student reflects on SPA and SAPA factor to decide how future behaviour may change to improve collaboration, interpersonal and reflection capabilities 4. Academic evaluates effectiveness (eg. online surveys, focus groups, ones own reflection)

Related items
This usecase is decomposed from the following usecases:
 * is decomposed from::Peer Assessment

This usecase includes the following usecases:
 * includes::Track (Run Assessment)